The Trump project has claimed, without evidence, there is voter fraud and wishes to stop the count in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Michigan.
We talk to legal specialists about what this suggests – and what comes next if the contest drags out.
Should not we understand the outcomes by now?
Yes and no. Usually, when the information shows a candidate has an unbeatable lead, the major United States networks state one prospect the winner. This tends to take place in the early hours of the early morning after voting day.
These are not official, outcomes – they are projections, and the final authorities tally has actually constantly taken days to count.
However this year’s huge volume of postal votes means the counting is taking longer, especially as some battleground states have actually not enabled counting ahead of election day.
So they have actually had to count everything on the day itself, and counting postal votes can take longer than in-person votes due to verification requirements.
If races are too close to call, and neither prospect yields, it’s typical for the counting to go on, states Matthew Weil, director of the Bipartisan Policy Research Center’s elections job.
There were obstacles prior to ballot
It was currently a really litigious election.
Prior to Tuesday’s vote, there were more than 300 lawsuits throughout 44 specifies concerning postal and early voting in elections this year.
They centred on a variety of problems such as the due date for posting and receiving ballots, the witness signatures required and the envelopes utilized to publish them.
Republican-run states said restrictions were needed to clamp down on vote fraud.
But Democrats said these were attempts to keep individuals from exercising their civic rights.
What are the difficulties released by Trump?
The president’s project stated it has actually asked for a recount in Wisconsin “based on problems seen” on Tuesday.
It’s unclear when this recount would take place, however, because normally these do not take place till after the county officials end up evaluating the votes. The state’s deadline for this part of the process is 17 November.
Columbia University Law School professor Richard Briffault says there was a recount in Wisconsin in 2016 also, and it “altered about a hundred votes”.
” A recount is not a method of, challenging the legality of a vote,” he describes. “It’s almost actually a way of making sure that the computations are right.”
Mr Trump won the state in 2016 by his slimmest margin – simply over 10,700 votes. On 4 November, his campaign revealed a lawsuit to stop the count there, though 96%of the votes have actually currently been unofficially tallied by regional election authorities.
The difficulty here centres on the state’s choice to count ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but arrive up to three days late. Republicans are seeking an appeal.
Mr Weil states he is most concerned about this conflict as the nation’s leading court was deadlocked on it prior to the election – and before Justice Amy Coney Barrett signed up with.
” They did indicate in some of their dissents that they would be interested in taking it after. So I do believe there is a risk that some of those [postal] tallies that were cast by election day and not gotten until Friday may be disposed of. I believe that would be the incorrect result, but I think that is a lawfully possible result”
However Weil includes that the election would have to be “really, extremely close for that to matter”. He mentions that state authorities had actually sent out
( Find Out More